<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bored or Not Bored.  That is the question.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eisenhamerengineering.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/bored-or-not-bored-that-is-the-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eisenhamerengineering.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/bored-or-not-bored-that-is-the-question/</link>
	<description>Broadcast Engineering &#38; IT Notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Eisenhamer</title>
		<link>http://eisenhamerengineering.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/bored-or-not-bored-that-is-the-question/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Eisenhamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eisenhamerengineering.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/bored-or-not-bored-that-is-the-question/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Eric,

I admit I have not kept up as I have had some busy weeks.  The answer to the question:  There is no resolve at this time!  Last week I sent more data for DaySequerra last week.  Still no answer.  Suspect a front end overload of the tuner, but I&#039;m skeptical at this time.  It does not matter what input I use I do not get good RF readings on the unit, yet I can pick up everything under the sun.  Off site using the antenna input it appears to work normally.  

The last I hear is they want me to attenuate the RF sample to a level I can use the low/antenna input and see what happens.  Still nothing yet.  I plan on purchasing more attenuators to go down further, but I do not think that will work.  
Crazy, eh?

Thanks for you interest!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>I admit I have not kept up as I have had some busy weeks.  The answer to the question:  There is no resolve at this time!  Last week I sent more data for DaySequerra last week.  Still no answer.  Suspect a front end overload of the tuner, but I&#8217;m skeptical at this time.  It does not matter what input I use I do not get good RF readings on the unit, yet I can pick up everything under the sun.  Off site using the antenna input it appears to work normally.  </p>
<p>The last I hear is they want me to attenuate the RF sample to a level I can use the low/antenna input and see what happens.  Still nothing yet.  I plan on purchasing more attenuators to go down further, but I do not think that will work.<br />
Crazy, eh?</p>
<p>Thanks for you interest!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://eisenhamerengineering.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/bored-or-not-bored-that-is-the-question/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 19:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eisenhamerengineering.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/bored-or-not-bored-that-is-the-question/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>What issue did you find in your M2.2R?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What issue did you find in your M2.2R?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
